FLIP HTML5 CATALOG REVIEW CODE

Hearing started in the district court on May 26, 2022, regarding the maintainability petition of the case. As per the top court of the country, a senior judicial officer with an experience of over 25-30 years could handle the case in a much better way. The very next day, the Apex Court transferred the proceedings to a district judge. The party later filed a Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court.Īfter the completion of survey, the findings were submitted in a report to the court on May 19 this year. The decision was again challenged by the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee in the Allahabad High court, which rejected the Committee’s plea. The Varanasi court appointed an Advocate Commissioner and also ordered videography survey of the complex in April this year.

The Single-Judge Bench of Justice Prakash Padia of Allahabad High Court ruled in September, 2021 that it would wait for further verdict on other cases related to the matter, which were pending in other courts. The petitioners further demanded ban on people causing damage to the idols. The Apex Court issued notice to the Union government in the matter.įive Hindu women filed a petition in the Varanasi Court in August last year, seeking permission to worship deities, such as Lord Hanuman, Nandi and Goddess Shringar Gauri, inside the Gyanvapi complex.

Bobde, took up a plea filed by Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, challenging the constitutional validity of the Places of Worship Act 1991 in March, 2021. The Supreme Court Bench, led by then Chief Justice S.A. The petitioner approached the lower court for resumption of hearing in the 1991 petition, as the Allahabad High Court had not extended the stay further. This led to an intervention by the AIMC, opposing the petition seeking ASI survey of the Gyanvapi complex.

the petitioner demanded survey of the entire disputed area by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). The High Court stayed the proceedings in the lower court for 22 years.Ī fresh petition was filed in 2019 by a person named Rastogi, calling himself as the ‘next friend’ of Swayambhu Jyotirlinga Bhagwan Vishweshwar. This was followed by a fresh case filed by the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee in Allahabad High Court in 1998, asserting that the temple-mosque land dispute could not be adjudicated by a civil court as it was not permissible by the law. This decided the fate of more than three decades-old issue, which was started by the filing of a petition by Swayambhu Jyotirlinga Bhagwan Vishweshwar in a Varanasi court in 1991, seeking the right to worship in the Gyanvapi complex.Īs per the 1991 plea, the petitioner demanded declaration of the entire Gyanvapi complex as a part of the Kashi temple, removal of Muslims from the complex area, and demolition of the mosque. The Anjuman Islamia Masjid Committee, which manages the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi, had challenged the maintainability of this suit, contending that the same was barred under the Places of Worship Act, 1991. The court agreed to hear on September 22, the plea by Hindu devotees, who sought right to worship Maa Shringar Gauri on the outer wall of the mosque complex located next to the Kashi Vishwanath temple. Ajay Kumar Vishveshva observed that the suit filed by the Hindu worshippers was not barred by The Places of Worship Act or the Waqf Act.

FLIP HTML5 CATALOG REVIEW CODE

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.Ī local court in Varanasi on Monday ruled that the petition filed by five Hindu women seeking permission to worship inside the Gyanvapi Mosque Complex was maintainable.ĭismissing the plea filed by the Anjuman Islamia Masjid Committee (AIMC) filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), District Judge Dr.

Flip html5 catalog review